FindLaw | Legal Professionals | Students | Business | Public | News   E-mail@Justice.com | MY FindLaw 
FindLaw Class Action Center
  Class Action Center | Class Action News | Class Action Notices | Class Action Settlements | Recalls | Legal Research & Practice Ad Info
Home
Accutane
Acetaminophen
Ambien
Aredia
Avandia
Baycol
Benzene
Beryllium
Bextra
Celebrex
Celexa
Cialis
Crestor
Darvon / Darvocet
Depo-Provera
Diclofenac
Drug-Coated Stents
Duragesic Patch
Effexor
Ephedra
Evista
Fen-Phen
Fluvoxamine
Food Poisoning
Fosamax
Gleevec
Guidant Defibrillator
Ketek
Lasik Eye Surgery
Lead Poisoning
Levitra
Lexapro
Light Cigarettes
Medtronic Defibrillator
Meridia
Mesothelioma - Asbestos
Mirapex
MoisturePlus Lens Solution
Motor Vehicle Defects
Neurontin
Ortho Evra Patch
Paxil
Perchlorate
Pergolide (Permax)
Popcorn Lung Illness
Prempro
Promethazine HCl
Prozac
ReNu with MoistureLoc
Risperdal
Seroquel
Serzone
Silicosis & Silica
Spinach Recall and E. coli
Symbyax
Tamiflu
Teflon
Tequin
Trasylol
Triaminic Vapor Patch
Viagra
Vioxx
Welding Rods
Zoloft
Zometa
Zyprexa
Recalls & Safety Alerts
Consumer Products
Food and Drugs
Motor Vehicles
News
Notices
Settlements
Legal Research

Class Actions and Other Multi-Party Litigation in a Nutshell

Robert H. Klonoff

Chapter 11, Part I (Mass Torts) Introduction to Part I

I. Mass Torts
No area of class-action law has generated more judicial and scholarly debate than mass tort class actions. A key element of that controversy arises from the 1966 Advisory Committee Notes, which state:

A "mass accident" resulting in injuries to numerous persons is ordinarily not appropriate for a class action because of the likelihood that significant questions, not only of damages but of liability and defenses of liability, would be present, affecting the individuals in different ways. In these circumstances an action conducted nominally as a class action would degenerate in practice into multiple lawsuits separately tried.

This note caused a number of early courts to refuse to certify mass tort cases. Later, several courts sought ways to certify mass tort class actions notwithstanding the concerns expressed by the Advisory Committee. Recently, however, a number of courts have again begun to view mass tort class actions with skepticism. This subchapter provides a brief historical overview of mass tort class actions and surveys some of the key issues facing courts today.

Preliminarily, it is important to define the term "mass tort." At its broadest, the term can apply to any multi?party lawsuit involving tort claims. In general, the term is used to describe either (i) a mass accident (a single event, such as an airplane crash, involving injuries to many people) or (ii) personal injuries on a widespread basis, typically involving allegedly defective products (such as breast implants or other medical devices). Mass tort cases may also involve widespread damage to property or other economic loss. In explaining the differences between these kinds of cases, the Manual for Complex Litigation (3d) notes: "In mass disaster litigation, the injuries occur at a single site and usually manifest themselves immediately; in mass toxic tort or defective product litigation injuries may occur in numerous widely dispersed locations, at different times, and their full effect may remain hidden for years."

As a general proposition, despite the cautionary language in the Advisory Committee Notes with respect to "mass accidents," courts have been more willing to certify mass accident cases than they have been to certify personal injury mass torts not involving a single event.

Copyright © 1999 West Group

 




  FindLaw.com
Advertising Info · Add URL · Help · Comments Jobs@FindLaw · Site Map
Company | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer Copyright © 1994-2008 FindLaw