FindLaw | Legal Professionals | Students | Business | Public | News   E-mail@Justice.com | MY FindLaw 
FindLaw Class Action Center
  Class Action Center | Class Action News | Class Action Notices | Class Action Settlements | Recalls | Legal Research & Practice Ad Info
Home
Accutane
Acetaminophen
Ambien
Aredia
Avandia
Baycol
Benzene
Beryllium
Bextra
Celebrex
Celexa
Cialis
Crestor
Darvon / Darvocet
Depo-Provera
Diclofenac
Drug-Coated Stents
Duragesic Patch
Effexor
Ephedra
Evista
Fen-Phen
Fluvoxamine
Food Poisoning
Fosamax
Gleevec
Guidant Defibrillator
Ketek
Lasik Eye Surgery
Lead Poisoning
Levitra
Lexapro
Light Cigarettes
Medtronic Defibrillator
Meridia
Mesothelioma - Asbestos
Mirapex
MoisturePlus Lens Solution
Motor Vehicle Defects
Neurontin
Ortho Evra Patch
Paxil
Perchlorate
Pergolide (Permax)
Popcorn Lung Illness
Prempro
Promethazine HCl
Prozac
ReNu with MoistureLoc
Risperdal
Seroquel
Serzone
Silicosis & Silica
Spinach Recall and E. coli
Symbyax
Tamiflu
Teflon
Tequin
Trasylol
Triaminic Vapor Patch
Viagra
Vioxx
Welding Rods
Zoloft
Zometa
Zyprexa
Recalls & Safety Alerts
Consumer Products
Food and Drugs
Motor Vehicles
News
Notices
Settlements
Legal Research

 Home > Securities > SEC Resources >

FindLaw Class Action and Mass Tort Center: Securities: SEC Resources:

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Litigation Release No. 16236/August 2, 1999

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. LAMBERT D. VANDER TUIG, Civil Action No. 99-07900 RAP(RCx) (C.D. Cal.)

On August 2, 1999, the Securities and Exchange Commission sued a former securities industry professional for manipulating the stock of a Michigan footwear manufacturer, Fastlane Footwear, Inc. The lawsuit charges the defendant with fraud and seeks the return of profits realized from the manipulation. The Commission alleges that from June 26, 1996 through July 8, 1996, Lambert D. Vander Tuig, age 40 and a resident of Coto de Caza, California, pumped up the price of Fastlane stock 56%, from its initial sale price of $3.12 to $4.88 a share.

In its lawsuit, which was filed in federal court in Los Angeles, the Commission charged Vander Tuig with, among other things, buying and selling Fastlane stock using nominee accounts and engaging in wash sale transactions between the accounts. This was done, according to the Commission, to dominate and control the supply of, and create artificial demand for, the security, thereby pushing up the price.

Fastlane, based in Jackson, Michigan, is a small non-reporting company which had assets and revenues of approximately $1 million during the relevant period.

As part of its lawsuit, the Commission charged Vander Tuig with violating the antifraud provisions, Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, as well as the registration provisions, Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act. The Commission is seeking a permanent injunction, disgorgement of all ill-gotten gains plus prejudgment interest and civil penalties.

This enforcement action is part of the Commission's four-pronged approach to attacking microcap fraud: enforcement, inspections, investor education and regulation. For more information about the SEC's response to microcap fraud and the litigation release for this case, visit the SEC's Microcap Fraud Information Center at http://www.sec.gov/news/extra/microcap.htm.




  FindLaw.com
Advertising Info · Add URL · Help · Comments Jobs@FindLaw · Site Map
Company | Privacy Policy | Disclaimer Copyright © 1994-2009 FindLaw